VA Dependent Component Update: Placement & Content

Hey guys,

We've got a crucial update regarding the "Who we consider a dependent" component on the VA.gov website. There's been a recent relocation of this component, and it's super important that we ensure it's correctly placed and functioning as intended. This article dives deep into the changes, the reasoning behind them, and the specific steps we need to take to ensure everything is shipshape. Let's get started!

Issue Overview

The core of the matter is that the "Who we consider a dependent" component has been moved. Previously, it resided on the "Do you have x to report" page. Now, it's been strategically repositioned to the "Relationship to Veteran" page. This move aims to provide users with the most relevant information at the most appropriate stage of the application process. However, it's come to our attention that the update hasn't fully propagated, hence this ticket to address the situation. An important thing to note is that the component's visibility is conditional; it depends on the claimantType. So, we need to make sure it appears in all applicable scenarios.

To illustrate the new placement, here's a visual:

Content Update: What Defines a Dependent?

Beyond the placement, we also need to update the content within the component itself. The goal here is to provide clear, concise, and user-friendly information about who the VA considers a dependent. The content team has meticulously crafted and approved the updated language, which can be found in this Figma design. This ensures we're all on the same page regarding the definitions and criteria.

Here's a snapshot of the approved content:

This updated content is crucial for ensuring applicants understand the criteria for dependency and can accurately complete their applications. We want to make the process as smooth and straightforward as possible for our veterans and their families.

Why This Update Matters

Relocating and updating the "Who we consider a dependent" component is more than just a cosmetic change; it's about enhancing the user experience and ensuring veterans have the information they need, when they need it. By placing this information on the "Relationship to Veteran" page, we're providing context at the point where it's most relevant. This proactive approach can reduce confusion and prevent errors in the application process. Imagine a veteran starting their application, only to realize later that they're unsure about who qualifies as a dependent. This relocation tackles that head-on.

The updated content is equally vital. Clear and concise language ensures that the criteria for dependency are easily understood. This minimizes the chances of misinterpretation and helps applicants provide accurate information. Ultimately, this leads to faster processing times and fewer delays in benefits disbursement. It's about making the system work better for those who have served our country.

Action Items: Tasks to Complete

To ensure this update is successful, we have two primary tasks:

• [ ] Verify Component Placement: We need to ensure that the "Who we consider a dependent" component is present on the "Relationship to Veteran" page for all relevant steps and claimant types. This involves testing various scenarios to confirm its visibility and functionality. Think of it like a treasure hunt, but instead of gold, we're searching for a component – a very important component!
• [ ] Content Alignment: We must guarantee that the language within the component aligns perfectly with the approved specifications. This means a meticulous comparison of the existing content with the content in the Figma design. It's like proofreading a crucial document, where every word counts.

These tasks are essential for meeting the acceptance criteria and ensuring the update is a success. Let's break down these tasks in more detail.

Task 1: Verifying Component Placement – A Deep Dive

This task requires a methodical approach. We can't just assume the component is in the right place; we need to prove it. This involves several steps:

1. Identify Applicable Scenarios: First, we need to map out all the scenarios where the "Who we consider a dependent" component should be visible. This means considering different claimant types and application workflows. Think about the various paths a veteran might take through the application process. We need to cover all our bases.
2. Test Each Scenario: For each scenario, we need to simulate a user's experience, navigating to the "Relationship to Veteran" page and verifying the presence of the component. This is where the rubber meets the road. We need to click through the application, step by step, and confirm the component's visibility.
3. Document Findings: Meticulous documentation is key. We need to record the results of each test, noting whether the component appeared as expected or if there were any discrepancies. This documentation serves as our evidence, showing that we've thoroughly validated the placement.
4. Address Discrepancies: If we find any instances where the component is missing or misplaced, we need to flag these issues and work to resolve them promptly. This might involve code changes, configuration adjustments, or other interventions. It's about fixing any gaps in our coverage.

Task 2: Content Alignment – The Devil's in the Details

Ensuring the content matches the specification is equally crucial. This isn't just about copy-pasting text; it's about ensuring the message is clear, consistent, and accessible. Here's how we'll tackle this task:

1. Side-by-Side Comparison: We'll start by placing the existing content of the component next to the approved content from the Figma design. This allows for a direct, word-by-word comparison. It's like having a cheat sheet right in front of you.
2. Verify Wording: We need to check that the wording is identical, paying close attention to nuances in phrasing and terminology. Even small differences can alter the meaning, so we need to be precise.
3. Check Formatting: Formatting matters too. We'll ensure that the use of bold text, headings, and bullet points is consistent with the specification. This ensures the content is visually appealing and easy to read.
4. Assess Accessibility: Accessibility is paramount. We'll verify that the content is screen-reader friendly and meets accessibility guidelines. This means considering things like alternative text for images and proper heading structures.
5. Implement Changes: If we identify any discrepancies, we'll make the necessary changes to align the content with the specification. This might involve editing text, adjusting formatting, or adding accessibility features.

Acceptance Criteria: Our Yardstick for Success

To know we've nailed this update, we'll use the following acceptance criteria as our benchmarks:

• [ ] Placement Accuracy: The "Who we consider a dependent" component must be correctly placed on the "Relationship to Veteran" page, in line with the specified requirements.
• [ ] Content Fidelity: The language within the component must precisely match the approved specification, ensuring clarity and accuracy.

These criteria provide a clear definition of success. If we meet these benchmarks, we know we've delivered a high-quality update that will benefit our users.

Configuration: Setting the Stage for Success

To ensure smooth progress and accountability, we need to configure this issue appropriately. This involves several steps:

• [ ] Milestone Assignment: We need to attach this issue to a milestone, setting a target date for completion. This helps us track progress and stay on schedule.
• [ ] Epic Association: Linking this issue to an epic helps us understand how it fits into the bigger picture and aligns with overall project goals.
• [ ] Team Labeling: We'll label the issue with the relevant team, such as product support or frontend, ensuring the right people are involved.
• [ ] Practice Area Labeling: Labeling with the practice area, like frontend, backend, or content, helps with organization and resource allocation.
• [ ] Type Designation: Finally, we'll label the issue with its type, such as bug, request, or documentation, providing further clarity.

By configuring the issue correctly, we set ourselves up for success. It's about providing context, assigning responsibility, and ensuring everyone is on the same page.

Conclusion: A Step Forward for Veterans

This update to the "Who we consider a dependent" component is a significant step in our ongoing efforts to improve the VA.gov experience. By relocating the component and updating its content, we're making it easier for veterans to understand their eligibility for benefits and complete their applications accurately. It's about providing clear information, at the right time, in the right place. This isn't just about fixing a bug or updating a page; it's about making a real difference in the lives of those who have served our country. So, let's dive in, tackle these tasks, and deliver a product we can all be proud of. You got this, guys!