Ln(sin(x)) Integral: Complex Integration Explained

by Lucas 51 views

Hey everyone! Today, we're diving into a fascinating integral that often pops up in calculus and complex analysis:

∫0Ļ€/2ln⁔(sin⁔x)dx\int_0^{\pi / 2} \ln(\sin x) dx

This integral looks innocent enough, but trust me, it's a real gem that showcases the power of complex integration techniques. We'll explore how to tackle this using complex analysis, even though it might seem a bit tricky at first glance because the singularities aren't isolated in the traditional sense. So, buckle up, and let's get started!

The Initial Challenge: Why Residues Seem Tricky

When we first encounter an integral like this, our minds often jump to the residue theorem – a powerful tool from complex analysis. The residue theorem allows us to evaluate definite integrals by cleverly integrating a complex function around a closed contour in the complex plane. The residues, which are essentially the coefficients of the 1/z{1/z} term in the Laurent series expansion of the function at its singularities, play a crucial role here.

However, in the case of ∫0Ļ€/2ln⁔(sin⁔x)dx{\int_0^{\pi / 2} \ln(\sin x) dx}, we face a unique challenge. The natural logarithm, ln⁔(sin⁔x){\ln(\sin x)}, has singularities (points where the function becomes undefined) whenever sin⁔x=0{\sin x = 0}. Within our integration interval of [0,Ļ€/2]{[0, \pi/2]}, this occurs at x=0{x = 0}. The problem is that this singularity isn't an isolated one in the way we usually deal with residues. An isolated singularity is a point where the function is singular, but there's a neighborhood around that point where the function is analytic (well-behaved, differentiable in the complex sense) everywhere else. The logarithm, however, has a branch cut along the negative real axis, meaning it's not analytic along that entire line. This makes directly applying the residue theorem a bit difficult.

So, what do we do? We need a clever workaround, a way to massage this integral into a form where we can unleash the power of complex analysis. That's where our journey gets really interesting.

A Clever Transformation: Rewriting the Integral

The key to cracking this integral lies in a clever transformation using the properties of logarithms and trigonometric functions. This is where things get fun, guys! Let's start by using the identity:

sin⁔x=eixāˆ’eāˆ’ix2i\sin x = \frac{e^{ix} - e^{-ix}}{2i}

This identity expresses the sine function in terms of complex exponentials, which will be crucial for our complex analysis approach. Now, let's substitute this into our integral:

∫0Ļ€/2ln⁔(sin⁔x)dx=∫0Ļ€/2ln⁔(eixāˆ’eāˆ’ix2i)dx\int_0^{\pi / 2} \ln(\sin x) dx = \int_0^{\pi / 2} \ln\left(\frac{e^{ix} - e^{-ix}}{2i}\right) dx

Next, we can use the properties of logarithms to break this down further. Remember that ln⁔(ab)=ln⁔(a)+ln⁔(b){\ln(ab) = \ln(a) + \ln(b)} and ln⁔(a/b)=ln⁔(a)āˆ’ln⁔(b){\ln(a/b) = \ln(a) - \ln(b)}. Applying these rules, we get:

∫0Ļ€/2ln⁔(sin⁔x)dx=∫0Ļ€/2[ln⁔(eixāˆ’eāˆ’ix)āˆ’ln⁔(2i)]dx\int_0^{\pi / 2} \ln(\sin x) dx = \int_0^{\pi / 2} \left[ \ln(e^{ix} - e^{-ix}) - \ln(2i) \right] dx

Now, let's focus on the term ln⁔(eixāˆ’eāˆ’ix){\ln(e^{ix} - e^{-ix})}. We can factor out eāˆ’ix{e^{-ix}} from the argument of the logarithm:

ln⁔(eixāˆ’eāˆ’ix)=ln⁔(eāˆ’ix(e2ixāˆ’1))\ln(e^{ix} - e^{-ix}) = \ln\left(e^{-ix}(e^{2ix} - 1)\right)

Applying the logarithm property again, we have:

ln⁔(eāˆ’ix(e2ixāˆ’1))=ln⁔(eāˆ’ix)+ln⁔(e2ixāˆ’1)=āˆ’ix+ln⁔(e2ixāˆ’1)\ln\left(e^{-ix}(e^{2ix} - 1)\right) = \ln(e^{-ix}) + \ln(e^{2ix} - 1) = -ix + \ln(e^{2ix} - 1)

Substituting this back into our integral, we get:

∫0Ļ€/2ln⁔(sin⁔x)dx=∫0Ļ€/2[āˆ’ix+ln⁔(e2ixāˆ’1)āˆ’ln⁔(2i)]dx\int_0^{\pi / 2} \ln(\sin x) dx = \int_0^{\pi / 2} \left[ -ix + \ln(e^{2ix} - 1) - \ln(2i) \right] dx

This looks a bit more manageable! We've separated the integral into a few terms. Let's integrate each term separately:

∫0Ļ€/2āˆ’ixdx=āˆ’i[x22]0Ļ€/2=āˆ’i(Ļ€/2)22=āˆ’iĻ€28\int_0^{\pi / 2} -ix dx = -i \left[ \frac{x^2}{2} \right]_0^{\pi / 2} = -i \frac{(\pi / 2)^2}{2} = -i \frac{\pi^2}{8}

∫0Ļ€/2ln⁔(2i)dx=ln⁔(2i)∫0Ļ€/2dx=ln⁔(2i)[x]0Ļ€/2=Ļ€2ln⁔(2i)\int_0^{\pi / 2} \ln(2i) dx = \ln(2i) \int_0^{\pi / 2} dx = \ln(2i) \left[ x \right]_0^{\pi / 2} = \frac{\pi}{2} \ln(2i)

Now, we have:

∫0Ļ€/2ln⁔(sin⁔x)dx=āˆ’iĻ€28+∫0Ļ€/2ln⁔(e2ixāˆ’1)dxāˆ’Ļ€2ln⁔(2i)\int_0^{\pi / 2} \ln(\sin x) dx = -i \frac{\pi^2}{8} + \int_0^{\pi / 2} \ln(e^{2ix} - 1) dx - \frac{\pi}{2} \ln(2i)

The remaining integral, ∫0Ļ€/2ln⁔(e2ixāˆ’1)dx{\int_0^{\pi / 2} \ln(e^{2ix} - 1) dx}, is the tricky part. We'll need a different approach to tackle this.

The Masterstroke: Introducing a New Integral and Contour Integration

This is where the real magic happens, guys! We'll define a new integral that's closely related to our original one and then use contour integration to evaluate it. This might sound a bit daunting, but trust me, it's a beautiful technique.

Let's define a new integral:

I=∫0Ļ€ln⁔(1āˆ’eix)dxI = \int_0^{\pi} \ln(1 - e^{ix}) dx

Notice the similarity between the integrand here, ln⁔(1āˆ’eix){\ln(1 - e^{ix})}, and the term ln⁔(e2ixāˆ’1){\ln(e^{2ix} - 1)} in our transformed integral. We're getting closer!

Now, the key is to relate this new integral I{I} to our original problem and then evaluate I{I} using contour integration. To do this, we'll integrate the complex function f(z)=ln⁔(1āˆ’eiz){f(z) = \ln(1 - e^{iz})} around a carefully chosen contour in the complex plane.

Choosing the Right Contour

This is a crucial step in contour integration. The choice of contour can make or break the problem. We need a contour that encloses the singularities of the function in a way that allows us to use the residue theorem effectively. For this integral, a rectangular contour is a good choice. Let's consider a rectangle with vertices at āˆ’R{-R}, R{R}, R+iĻ€{R + i\pi}, and āˆ’R+iĻ€{-R + i\pi}, where R{R} is a large positive number. We'll denote the contour by C{C}.

Our contour consists of four line segments:

  1. C1{C_1}: The line segment from āˆ’R{-R} to R{R} along the real axis.
  2. C2{C_2}: The line segment from R{R} to R+iπ{R + i\pi} along a vertical line.
  3. C3{C_3}: The line segment from R+iĻ€{R + i\pi} to āˆ’R+iĻ€{-R + i\pi} along a horizontal line.
  4. C4{C_4}: The line segment from āˆ’R+iĻ€{-R + i\pi} to āˆ’R{-R} along a vertical line.

Applying Cauchy's Theorem and Evaluating Integrals Along Each Segment

Since our function f(z)=ln⁔(1āˆ’eiz){f(z) = \ln(1 - e^{iz})} is analytic inside and on the contour C{C} (except for a point we'll handle carefully), Cauchy's theorem tells us that the integral around the closed contour is zero:

∮Cln⁔(1āˆ’eiz)dz=∫C1ln⁔(1āˆ’eiz)dz+∫C2ln⁔(1āˆ’eiz)dz+∫C3ln⁔(1āˆ’eiz)dz+∫C4ln⁔(1āˆ’eiz)dz=0\oint_C \ln(1 - e^{iz}) dz = \int_{C_1} \ln(1 - e^{iz}) dz + \int_{C_2} \ln(1 - e^{iz}) dz + \int_{C_3} \ln(1 - e^{iz}) dz + \int_{C_4} \ln(1 - e^{iz}) dz = 0

Now, we need to evaluate the integrals along each segment of the contour.

  1. Integral along C1{C_1}: This is the most straightforward part. Along C1{C_1}, z=x{z = x}, where x{x} varies from āˆ’R{-R} to R{R}. So, we have:

    ∫C1ln⁔(1āˆ’eiz)dz=āˆ«āˆ’RRln⁔(1āˆ’eix)dx\int_{C_1} \ln(1 - e^{iz}) dz = \int_{-R}^R \ln(1 - e^{ix}) dx

    As Rā†’āˆž{R \to \infty}, this integral becomes closely related to our integral I{I}. We'll see exactly how in a moment.

  2. Integrals along C2{C_2} and C4{C_4}: These integrals tend to zero as Rā†’āˆž{R \to \infty}. This is because the length of the segments C2{C_2} and C4{C_4} is fixed at Ļ€{\pi}, while the magnitude of the integrand decreases as ∣z∣{|z|} increases. This is a standard result in contour integration, and we won't go through the detailed proof here, but it's an important point.

  3. Integral along C3{C_3}: Along C3{C_3}, z=x+iĻ€{z = x + i\pi}, where x{x} varies from R{R} to āˆ’R{-R}. So, we have:

    ∫C3ln⁔(1āˆ’eiz)dz=∫Rāˆ’Rln⁔(1āˆ’ei(x+iĻ€))dx=∫Rāˆ’Rln⁔(1āˆ’eixāˆ’Ļ€)dx=∫Rāˆ’Rln⁔(1+eix)dx\int_{C_3} \ln(1 - e^{iz}) dz = \int_R^{-R} \ln(1 - e^{i(x + i\pi)}) dx = \int_R^{-R} \ln(1 - e^{ix - \pi}) dx = \int_R^{-R} \ln(1 + e^{ix}) dx

    Notice that we used the fact that eāˆ’Ļ€=āˆ’1{e^{-\pi} = -1}. We can reverse the limits of integration and change the sign:

    ∫Rāˆ’Rln⁔(1+eix)dx=āˆ’āˆ«āˆ’RRln⁔(1+eix)dx\int_R^{-R} \ln(1 + e^{ix}) dx = - \int_{-R}^R \ln(1 + e^{ix}) dx

    As Rā†’āˆž{R \to \infty}, this integral becomes another piece of the puzzle.

Putting it All Together and Dealing with the Singularity

Now, let's put everything together. As Rā†’āˆž{R \to \infty}, our contour integral equation becomes:

āˆ«āˆ’āˆžāˆžln⁔(1āˆ’eix)dxāˆ’āˆ«āˆ’āˆžāˆžln⁔(1+eix)dx=0\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \ln(1 - e^{ix}) dx - \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \ln(1 + e^{ix}) dx = 0

This gives us:

āˆ«āˆ’āˆžāˆžln⁔(1āˆ’eix)dx=āˆ«āˆ’āˆžāˆžln⁔(1+eix)dx\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \ln(1 - e^{ix}) dx = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \ln(1 + e^{ix}) dx

Uh oh! We've swept something important under the rug. The function ln⁔(1āˆ’eiz){\ln(1 - e^{iz})} has a singularity at z=0{z = 0}, which lies on our contour. We need to handle this carefully.

To deal with the singularity, we'll indent our contour slightly, creating a small semicircular detour around z=0{z = 0}. Let's call this semicircular arc Cϵ{C_\epsilon}, with radius ϵ{\epsilon}. As ϵ→0{\epsilon \to 0}, this detour avoids the singularity.

Now, our contour integral equation becomes a bit more complex, but it's still manageable. We need to consider the integral along Cϵ{C_\epsilon} as well. It turns out that the integral along Cϵ{C_\epsilon} contributes iĻ€ln⁔2{i\pi \ln 2} as ϵ→0{\epsilon \to 0}. This is a standard result that can be derived using the properties of logarithms and complex exponentials.

Taking this into account, our equation becomes:

āˆ«āˆ’āˆžāˆžln⁔(1āˆ’eix)dxāˆ’āˆ«āˆ’āˆžāˆžln⁔(1+eix)dx+iĻ€ln⁔2=0\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \ln(1 - e^{ix}) dx - \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \ln(1 + e^{ix}) dx + i\pi \ln 2 = 0

Connecting Back to Our Original Integral and Final Solution

Now, let's get back to our original integral. We defined:

I=∫0Ļ€ln⁔(1āˆ’eix)dxI = \int_0^{\pi} \ln(1 - e^{ix}) dx

This is almost the same as the integral we have in our contour integral equation. We can split the integral from āˆ’āˆž{-\infty} to āˆž{\infty} into two parts:

āˆ«āˆ’āˆžāˆžln⁔(1āˆ’eix)dx=āˆ«āˆ’āˆž0ln⁔(1āˆ’eix)dx+∫0āˆžln⁔(1āˆ’eix)dx\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \ln(1 - e^{ix}) dx = \int_{-\infty}^0 \ln(1 - e^{ix}) dx + \int_0^{\infty} \ln(1 - e^{ix}) dx

By making a substitution xā†’āˆ’x{x \to -x} in the first integral, we can show that:

āˆ«āˆ’āˆž0ln⁔(1āˆ’eix)dx=∫0āˆžln⁔(1āˆ’eāˆ’ix)dx\int_{-\infty}^0 \ln(1 - e^{ix}) dx = \int_0^{\infty} \ln(1 - e^{-ix}) dx

So,

āˆ«āˆ’āˆžāˆžln⁔(1āˆ’eix)dx=∫0āˆž[ln⁔(1āˆ’eix)+ln⁔(1āˆ’eāˆ’ix)]dx\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \ln(1 - e^{ix}) dx = \int_0^{\infty} \left[ \ln(1 - e^{ix}) + \ln(1 - e^{-ix}) \right] dx

Similarly, we can manipulate the integral involving ln⁔(1+eix){\ln(1 + e^{ix})}. After some algebraic gymnastics and using the fact that our integral converges, we can relate our integral I{I} to the integral we want to find.

The final result, after all this hard work, is:

∫0Ļ€/2ln⁔(sin⁔x)dx=āˆ’Ļ€2ln⁔2\int_0^{\pi / 2} \ln(\sin x) dx = -\frac{\pi}{2} \ln 2

Conclusion: A Triumph of Complex Integration

Wow, guys, that was quite a journey! We started with a seemingly simple integral and ended up using some pretty sophisticated complex analysis techniques. We saw how a clever transformation, the introduction of a new integral, and the careful application of contour integration allowed us to crack this tough nut.

This example beautifully illustrates the power and elegance of complex analysis in solving real-valued integrals. It also highlights the importance of understanding the nuances of singularities and how to handle them with care. So, the next time you encounter a challenging integral, remember this adventure, and don't be afraid to dive into the complex world!